Aug 22

According to Canon, this Mode takes the scan process from eight steps down to two because it recognizes the type of document and finds the correct settings automatically, eliminating the need to do things like select resolution or crop images after they’re scanned. “EZ Buttons” on the units (four each on the LiDE models and seven on the 5600F) allow users, as usual, to skip using a computer to control the scanner and simply press buttons to copy, scan, e-mail, and create PDFs.

Canon Canoscan 5600F

I ditched my fax machine a long time ago in favor of scanning and e-mailing documents. It’s not the most efficient thing to do for documents more than a few pages, but I’d much rather have a low-profile scanner on my desk like these new Canon Canoscans than a big, ugly machine that’s sole purpose is to send faxes. Plus, the new Auto Scan Mode on these three models–the LiDE100, LiDE200, and 5600F–supposedly takes care of the scanning process for you.

(Credit:
Canon)

(Credit:
Canon)

Canon Canoscan LiDE200

Canon Canoscan LiDE100

(Credit:
Canon)

Though the $149.99 Canoscan 5600F is a little thicker than the LiDE models, it’s also more powerful, designed more for photo archiving than office productivity. It’s able to scan up to six frames of a 35mm filmstrip or four 35mm slides at a maximum optical resolution of 4,800×9,600 dpi, scan letter-size color documents at a resolution of 300 dpi in approximately 11 seconds, uses white LEDs so there’s no warmup time, and like the others it has the QARE Level 3 technology for cleaning up scans.

The CanoScan LiDE200 ($89.99) and LiDE100 ($59.99) are thin, USB-powered Contact Image Sensor (CIS) scanners capable of scanning at 4,800×4,800 dpi and 2,400×4,800 dpi respectively. Both feature Canon’s Quick and Automatic Retouching and Enhancement (QARE) Level 3 technology for automatic dust, scratch, fading and graininess reduction. Both are also fairly fast for the money, able to scan letter-size color documents at a resolution of 300 dpi in approximately 14 seconds with the 200 and 24 seconds with the 100.

Aug 22

The “Q” non-Extreme quad-core processors typically have clock speeds, front-side bus (FSB) speeds, and thermal envelopes that are lower than Extreme processors which have the “QX” prefix before the processor model number.

The Q9550, Q9450, and Q9300 Core 2 Quad processors are now available in systems from PC suppliers such as Alienware and Velocity Micro. Retail availability is still limited, however. Resellers such as Buy.com and Computers4sure list the Q9550 and Q9450 as “sold out” or “out of stock.”

Intel’s Q series of mainstream 45-nanometer desktop quad-core processors are finally starting to trickle out. These chips were announced back in the beginning of January amid reports of delays.

(Credit:
Intel Corp.)

The Q series of processors have the following specifications and prices:
Q9550: 2.83GHz, 12MB cache, 1333-MHz FSB: $530
Q9450: 2.66GHz, 12MB cache, 1333-MHz FSB: $316
Q9300: 2.50GHz, 06MB cache, 1333-MHz FSB: $266

Intel Core 2 Quad processor

The QX97700 (3.20 GHz, 12MB cache, 1600 MHz FSB), an Extreme quad-core desktop processor, has also recently become available, priced at $1,399.

“We are really seeing high demand on these parts, and we are filling orders as fast as we can,” an Intel spokesperson said Tuesday. The spokesperson added that “most” of the processors had just launched into the market this week.

Aug 21

MIAMI–You’ve heard of extreme makeovers and then home makeovers. Get ready for school makeovers.

Microsoft and DirecTV announced a partnership on Thursday that will see the two companies, among other things, revamping schools in Miami and Latin America and then documenting their progress in a TV show.

The effort, dubbed Piedra, Papel y Tijera (Rock, Paper and Scissors), will see a number of schools and educational centers in Latin America outfitted with the latest technology. DirecTV will film the transitions and air the documentaries throughout Latin America on channel 999. Although the focus is on Latin America, Microsoft and DirecTV are starting with a pilot school here in Miami.

In addition to giving schools a makeover, DirecTV, Microsoft, and the Discovery Channel are also working on a program called Escuela+ that will see educational programs beamed to participating schools via satellite, in some cases being watched live and in other cases stored on digital video recorders. One of the programs, Microsoft Help Desk, will train teachers and students how to provide technical support to their own computer labs. It began as a pilot program in January with 21 schools in Puerto Rico, with the effort now expanding to Chile, Colombia, and Peru.

Speaking at a press conference, DirecTV Senior Vice President Jacopo Bracco said that his company will enable the content to reach further into Latin America given its satellite technology.

“This is the advantage we provide,” he said. “That’s our strength.”

It’s not the first tie-up between the two companies. Two years ago, Microsoft and DirecTV announced plans to bring DirecTV and Windows Media Center closer together. A spec sheet for a product that tied the two was reportedly shown at CES, but no products have yet come to market.

Aug 21

The most interesting takeaways from the graph? Opera’s gotten the most versioning love for its age, and all of the browsers share a fairly similar updating schedule at various parts of each year.

Note: viewing the chart in IE6 won’t work.

[Found on Digg]

(Credit:
Eric Meyer / CNET Networks)

Meyer notes that he created the graph after getting fed up with Wikipedia’s vertical charts. The result is a chart that will likely require you to do the dreaded horizontal scroll–that is unless you’ve got your hands on one of those NEC wide-screen displays.

Here’s an evening treat for your eyes. CSS guru Eric Meyer has put together a spiffy-looking timeline chronicling the lives (and versions) of five popular Web browsers. Internet Explorer makes it on there twice as Meyer has opted to split up the versions between 6 and the (soon to be mandatory) Version 7. the PC and now defunct
Mac version, which Microsoft capped in 2003.

Aug 20

hi/fn–With a market cap of $2 billion during the tech bubble, this data security company was going places. Well, not exactly. The company hasn’t been in the black and annual sales have been stuck in the $40 million range since 2000. Dumb name, too.

Depressing, isn’t it?

Zilog–Zilog is the poster child for great, famous companies now doomed to obscurity. Revenues have been continuously declining and the company’s been losing money for as far back as I can remember. Taking it private, taking it public again, management changes, restructurings, nothing has worked.

Why bother looking at this stuff? Well, it’s fun–at least for me it is–and it’s also instructive; we can always learn from others’ mistakes. After all, companies don’t go bad, executives who run them and boards that oversee them are always responsible.

One more thing: this may raise a few eyebrows, but here are a few companies that I think are well on their way to making the list if they don’t watch it: Atmel, National Semiconductor, On Semiconductor, Pixelworks, Silicon Image, Sun Microsystems, and Virage Logic. Mark my words.

Anyway, what’s different about these 10 companies is that they were once important, maybe even exciting. And now, for one reason or another, they’re fading slowly and tediously into obscurity. Like people, most companies go out, not with a bang, but with a whimper.

Ten irrelevant technology companies

Vitesse–This 24-year old communications chip company was once valued at $20 billion. Now, thanks to the dot.com bust, stock options backdating and accounting scandals, and general mismanagement, Vitesse is falling apart at the seams and running out of cash.

Sigmatel–Can you say “flash in the pan”? Sales rocketed from $30 million to over $300 million in three years, then fell off a cliff the following year while swinging to a $109 million loss. Just announced a sale to Freescale for a paltry $110 million.

Neomagic–This was once a hot young company with annual sales of $250 million, solid profit margins, and a $1.5 billion market cap, and that was before the tech bubble. That was also before demand for its embedded memory technology dried up. Last year’s sales were less than a million bucks.

The great corporate graveyard is filled with hundreds, maybe thousands, of technology companies that managed to go public and then fizzled. Still, most of them weren’t going anywhere and never should have gone public to begin with.

Cirrus Logic–There was a time when this company’s graphics chips and storage controllers were everywhere. That was a long time ago. Annual sales have declined from their peak at $1.1 billion in 1996 to $183 million last year. That said, Cirrus is profitable. Irrelevant, but profitable.

Transmeta–Valued at $11 billion in an overhyped IPO, it was all downhill from there for this low-power microprocessor company. Then it cut a licensing deal with Intel last year. Still, last quarter’s revenues were 44 thousand–that’s right, thousand–dollars.

MIPS–Spun off from Silicon Graphics 10 years ago, this licensor of embedded processor technology is a real enigma. According to the company’s Web site, its technology is everywhere. Still, there’s no consistent profitability or growth. Revenues topped out at just $89 million back in 2000.

Silicon Graphics–Once a $3.6 billion computer powerhouse, last year’s sales were down to $341 million and dropping precipitously. It’s also been bleeding like a stuck pig for nine of the last ten years. One foot in the grave …

Where do these companies go from here? They’ll either get swooped up for bargain-basement prices, like Sigmatel, or die an agonizingly slow death. There’s always a slim possibility of a turnaround, but that’ll require at least a management and board shakeup. Don’t hold your breath.

But venture capitalists funded them, investment banks underwrote them, analysts wrote glowing reports about them, and you and I bought into it, gullible lemmings that we are. Sorry for being such a negatron; that’s just the way it is.

Conexant–Rockwell didn’t just saddle its chip spinoff with a bad name. In its ten years of existence this communications chip company has lost an aggregate $4.7 billion on sales of $8.2 billion. Amazingly, its market cap was once $60 billion!

While this process is admittedly subjective, it is based on metrics, primarily chronic revenue decline or stagnation, the more red ink the better.

Aug 19

With the industry doing back flips about server virtualization, it is only natural to wonder what virtualization technology can do for desktops. Plenty! With desktop virtualization, organizations can manage desktop images in the data center and employ strict security policies without touching physical devices. Enterprises should be able to cut operating costs while bolstering security to boot.

No one would argue that these benefits are worth exploring, but there are a few caveats here. First off, not all desktops are good candidates for virtualization. Anyone who needs massive endpoint compute power, like engineers and designers, would not be a good candidate for desktop virtualization. Road warriors who need to work remotely are also off limits at this point. Finally, employees anchored to local or remote desktop tower computers may be better served by application virtualization (a la Citrix XenApp or Symantec AppStream) or file virtualization (a la F5 or Cisco Systems) rather than a desktop virtualization play.

When the virtualization smoke clears, large enterprises will deploy a number of virtualization technologies best suited for different types of users. Like everything else in the IT world, desktop virtualization isn’t black and white but many shades of gray. Alas, as promising as desktop virtualization is, it is not a panacea and never will be.

Aug 16

The main purpose of promoting the (canvas) bags is to encourage the consumers to reuse the materials, he added. Some old living habits should not be thrown away, no matter how fast the economy has developed.

Chinese authorities in January announced they would ban ultrathin plastic bags, and make customers pay for reusable canvas grocery bags, in an effort to reduce waste.

(Credit:
Paper Nor Plastic)

“When I was a child, my mother always took me to the vegetable market with a bamboo basket. She put a bowl in the basket for holding bean curd. When we bought sugar powder or salt, the sellers would wrap them with a piece of paper. I miss those days very much,” Jin said.

A Beijing Review article quotes a Hangzhou supermarket manager on the old days, when shopping didn’t produce billions of bags worth of waste that will biodegrade only after 200 years, if at all.

Are reusable shopping bags a thing of the future?

I would worry a little bit about my ability to move tofu in a bowl on my bike in Beijing, but I’m more or less onboard with the initiative. It’s sometimes hard to convince cashiers that I’d like to put my food in the canvas bag with my books and computer. I’ve never thought of bringing an old jar when buying grains, but that wouldn’t be a bad idea at all!

Aug 16

So, my focus has been on how to work with the JasperSoft community and our partners’ communities to deliver new value to customers who are increasingly considering the open source BI alternative.

Disclosure: I am an advisor to JasperSoft.

Q: Who’s the next open-source acquisition target?

Q: You joined JasperSoft just a couple of months ago. What have you been working on?

With more than 2.5 million downloads worldwide and more than 7,000 commercial customers in 96 countries, JasperSoft is on a roll. But with Pentaho getting $12 million more in funding, there’s no easy sailing for JasperSoft. I wanted to see how Brian was planning to navigate the difficult dynamics of his industry.

We’re all addressing a multi-billion dollar annual market opportunity, not competing with other open-source slices in the BI software stack. Customers understand more and more that open source takes the risk out of BI and puts the right economics in. Open-source BI tools are easier to use and enable better access to the right data, which fuels better business decisions. The JasperSoft community has unparalleled depth and vibrancy. All in all, these are the reasons for my bullishness.

I recently caught up with Brian Gentile, JasperSoft’s new CEO, to get his take on the rampant industry consolidation in the Business Intelligence world, where JasperSoft competes. I also asked him about his favorite open-source software (shouldn’t have, as you’ll see :-) and whether open-source interoperability is a “must have” for his customers.

Q: What did you do before?

BG: I’m a huge Drupal fan and believe that having the ability to build a more sophisticated, richer-media-based web site and then manage it well is surely a natural next step for so many net citizens who have already embraced blogging, forums, video sharing and so on. I expect this will be the next frontier of authorship, really. So, watch out Matt - you’ll have even more editorial competition on your hands with tools like this!

Q: What open source tools are you using and tinkering with?

Q: What are you hearing from your customers?

BG: I would argue that the “winner takes all” philosophy transcends the open-source arena. From a vendor economics view, Microsoft seems to have done fairly well in the operating system and office productivity categories. Of course we think there’s really only one open-source BI company, and it’s JasperSoft. But there’s plenty of room for competition from companies such as Pentaho that can offer pieces of the BI stack.

BG: Consolidation is nothing new in software but today it has different consequences for consumers of technology given the presence and maturity of open source software. Customers and contributors will flock to open source BI to get the choice, flexibility and innovation that has been stripped from their grasp without their consent by the legacy proprietary vendors. One of the great things about open source is that it’s bigger than any single vendor.

BG: Well, I’ve been on the JasperSoft board for more than two years, so I came to the table in many ways ready to go. I think JasperSoft’s opportunity is in its ability to offer choice and flexibility in a market where customers are facing the realities of hegemony: fewer choices, higher costs and little innovation. It’s true that choice and flexibility are inherent features of open-source software, but in the BI market, where consolidation is at an all-time high, it’s more relevant than ever.

commentary

And to think we were getting along so well up until that point. :-)

BG: I just came from Informatica and have also worked for Brio Software. I also spent a number of years at both Sun and Apple working with the developer communities at each company.

BG: I know this has been a highly-debated topic, especially on your blog, but I have to say that customers tell us they need interoperability among open-source applications. They get why open source make sense in their environment, and they no doubt enjoy the low cost, but as they use more open-source point solutions, they need them to work together. There are a number of ways to address this; I think one of the most compelling ways is to foster community overlap - some call it “meta-communities” - at both the developer and business-user levels. This is an area I’m especially interested in.

Q: I recently wrote a post about “winner takes all in open source,” where I made the point that there is only room for one open-source company in each category. How do you respond to this considering you share your space with Pentaho?

BG: The reason open-source companies have become serious acquisition targets is customers are increasingly validating the model. The companies that will be the most sought after will have the largest, most loyal communities and existing contracts with major customers. Certainly, there a number of targets about which to speculate, not the least of which is one I think you’re quite familiar with - Alfresco.

Q: Thanks for the plug. (Bids start at $1 billion. :-) But what about all the consolidation going on in the business intelligence space? Is this good or bad for JasperSoft?

It’s great to see Brian’s experience being put to use by JasperSoft. He’s a great addition to the open-source business community. Welcome!

Aug 16

Wired has a great interactive info-graphic on the path blog posts take once you hit the “go” button.

Since I joined the CNet blog network I’ve found that more and more of the content I post is scraped and put on link harvesting blogs. There appear to be a few keywords (Microsoft, Apple, MacBook) that drive the most leeches.

You have a blog. You compose a new post. You click Publish and lean back to admire your work. Imperceptibly and all but instantaneously, your post slips into a vast and recursive network of software agents, where it is crawled, indexed, mined, scraped, republished, and propagated throughout the Web. Within minutes, if you’ve written about a timely and noteworthy topic, a small army of bots will get the word out to anyone remotely interested, from fellow bloggers to corporate marketers.

Aug 16

Despite its charms, the application is missing a few things that would make it the holy grail of Google Docs tools. It’s lacking support for Google’s latest Docs addition–presentations. It also always remembers your account information, so if your phone gets stolen someone could get extensive access to your work. That said, you can’t create new items, rename files, or send anything to someone else through e-mail, so you don’t have to worry about people changing or distributing existing work.

I still like that you can grab something large like an expense sheet or eBook from Google Docs, then access it while offline. It makes for a handy utility if you’re willing to approach it as a middleman for your content. Developer Thomas Post (aka v1ru8) is also the creator or two other applications, iPhoneNotes and the upcoming Marks.

(Credit:
CNET Networks / Josh Lowensohn)

If you’re not satisfied with Google’s cute but data-sucking incarnation of Google Docs through mobile Safari, you might want to download MiGhtyDocs. This free application on the app store will pull down all of your documents and spreadsheets from the service, making them available to read and access even when away from a data connection.

Check out all your Google Documents at once, then open them to read later–even when offline.

All you have to do to get any document cached for offline viewing is open it once. If there are any changes since the last time you accessed it, they’ll be download the next time it syncs back up with Google’s servers. If you’re worried about privacy you can also completely clear out the cache whenever you please.

« Previous Entries Next Entries »